If the wing span on a Boeing 757 is 125 ft. across then how did it slam into the Pentagon and only leave
a hole no bigger than 20 feet across?
If a plane really crashed there then where were the plane parts?
If it's true that the plane didn't crash there then where did it crash and what happened to the vicitims?
All of the victims seemed to have been related in the fact that they worked for military in the past or
gov. branch of some sort, maybe they worked for research or something but they weren't ordinary people. So why were so many
unordinary people on the same flight?
And with such few passengers on a plane that can hold up to 200.
Note: this is not my original text, this information was received from various websites that you may find links to on this
site.
Newshounds is correct in stating that a more comprehensive investigation should be undertaken as to what happened on Sept.11,
2001, if not by Fox News, then certainly by a reliable organization. According to official sources, the Pentagon was struck
a blow by the third hijacked plane, American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757-200, at about 9:38 AM. What raises questions
is the damage done by the plane. Pictures taken before the Pentagon's west block collapsed show a hole just 13 feet wide and
26 feet high. Research scientist and software engineer Jim Hoffman explains {" '9/11'" Great Crimes/ A Greater Cover-up, p.7}
that a 757 is over 44 feet high; its wingspan is over 124 feet; and as the aitrcraft that hit the Pentagon approached at a
45-degree angle, he calculates that the damage a 757 would have made would be about 177 feet in width. There is some additional
damage across the building's first floor, but this covers only an area about 90 feet in width.
Another mystery is that the damage was so low in the building that, for Flight 77 to have caused it, it would need to have
perfectly horizontally, barely inching above the lawn in front of the Pentagon. Yet, photos clearly show that the lawn was
left perfectly intact, with no scorch marks or signs of gouging from a Boeing. Nor do any photographs show large pieces of
debris recognizable as belonging to Flight 77. Seemingly, 60 tons of aluminum simply disappeared.
April Gallop, who worked at the Pentagon when the explosion occurred, was visited afterwards at a hospital by men in suits
who never identified themselves to her, but told her "what to do, which was to take the {Victim Compensation Fund} money and
shut up. They also kept insisting that a plane hit the building. They repeated this over and over. But I was there and I never
saw a plane or even debris from a plane". {"Inside Job: Unmasking the 9/11 Conspiracies" Jim Marrs 2004 p. 26}.
Also, video footage that would show the Pentagon being hit was promptly seized by the FBI and has never been made public.
The security cameras of a nearby gas station and hotel caught the attack but were quickly confiscated by the FBI.
Are all of these things a coincidence or a sign of, shall we dare say it, a cover-up? At the very least, 9/11 calls for
a more thorough investigation than what has been brought forth by the 9/11 commission.
We now know Flight 77 was not crashed into the Pentagon.
Dick Eastman eastman@compwrx.com We now know Flight 77 was not crashed into the Pentagon. Sat Mar 30 16:27:39 2002 68.3.132.0
We now
know Flight 77 was not crashed into the Pentagon. An F-16 flew over the Boeing 757 for a while, and then the airliner was diverted
with transponder off, flown by remote control to either crash site or a landing site known only to the 911 perpetrators.
Passengers and crew may be alive or may have been alive as captives some days following September 11.
I know
this is far-fetched. I know this is not what the families of the victims need to hear right now. But there is a possibility
that kidnap victims are being held somewhere and my responsibility is to them if they exist (and I think they may.)
When
I leered that Hillary Clinton's severest biographer critic, Barbara Olsen was on Flight 77 it became important to learn
what business put her on Flight 77 to Los Angeles on September 11. From now on the passengers of flight 77 must be considered
possible kidnap victims. The amorality and arrogance of the criminal elites responsible for the 911 frame-up make this a
reasonable suspicion and avenue of investigation. But another theory that must be also be tested against the facts involves
a willing cell-phone actress. Intelligent internet discussants of every political stripe are concluding that Flight 77
was not destroyed at the Pentagon. We must determine where the abductors took that plane.
I have long been convinced
that Hillary Clinton was behind the Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman murders that created the distraction the night before
the very day Hillary became the first First Lady to testify in a criminal investigation. I also know that she was involved
in serious economic crime when she received criminal payment for corrupt services in the form of a million-to-one (i.e.
impossible to come by honestly) illegally manipulated first-timer bonanza killing in the commodities futures speculation.
Also, that she had one of the Secret Service men she detested, a man who might have heard too much, transferred to Okalahoma
city -- to perish in the bombing of the Murrah Federal Building there, even as the drug-trade-dealing BATF chose to
be away from the office that day. And there is the Vince Foster murder. If Mrs. Olsen is in the hands of Hillary Clinton
and her associates now, I am sure she would much rather be in the Atlantic trench.
Ever wonder about all the unaccounted-for
time that Bill Clinton (that closet Bush man and cfr stooge and hit man) spent in Harlem, New York prior to September
11.
It's time for the many who know about these crimes to come forward -- but come forward to the internet first
-- it is the people, not the criminals who need to hear your story.
Dick Eastman Yakima, Washington
Related: ========= TOP
VIEW The Bigger Picture
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steveseymour/lies911/lies.htm
3.29.02 911 'phone calls' from doomed planes NEVER HAPPENED
-- (It's) "easy to imagine an infinite number
of situations . . . where government officials might quite legitimately have reasons to give false information out."
-- US Solicitor General Ted Olson, husband of the late Barbara Olson
Find out how the BushMob/FedGov set the
foundation and cornerstone for their MASSIVE tower of lies regarding what happened on 9.11.
It was all based on
those alleged cell phone calls which ever-ingenious Fed arch-traitors have claimed were placed by the likes of Barbara
Olson and Todd Beamer, in which the intrepid and resourceful cell-phoners allegedly described how towel-headed Islamic
"hijackers" armed with "box cutters" and other such weapons of mass destruction were allegedly in the act of commandeering
large passenger aircraft... even as they apparently generously allowed Olson, Beamer and others to place their alleged
cell phone calls.
It is PROVEN: those calls could NEVER have been made, and WERE NEVER MADE.
And upon this have
the BushMob arch-traitors constructed their tower crap-pile of wretched 9.11 lies.
And just THINK about what a COLD-BLOODED
GHOUL this Ted Olson is: now that WE KNOW that HE KNEW his own wife was literally being sacrificed on 9.11, to further
the supremely DIABOLICAL and satanic agendas of the globalist BushMob's upper echelon.
Mother of All
Lies About 9/11 Barbara Olson's "Phone Call" From Flight 77
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steveseymour/lies911/lies.htm
This is a story about a little white lie that bred dozens of other little white lies, then hundreds of bigger white
lies and so on, to the point where the first little white lie must be credited as the "Mother of All Lies" about events on
11 September 2001. For this was the little white lie that first activated the American psyche, generated mass loathing, and
enabled media manipulation of the global population. Without this little white lie there would have been no Arab Hijackers,
no Osama Bin Laden directing operations from afar, and no "War on Terror" in Afghanistan and occupied Palestine. Clearly the
lie was so clever and diabolical in nature, it must have been generated by the "Power Elite" in one of its more earthly manifestations.
Perhaps it was the work of the Council on Foreign Relations, or the Trilateral Commission? No, it was not. Though at the
time the little white lie was flagged with a powerful political name, there was and remains no evidence to support the connection.
Just like the corrupt and premature Lee Harvey Oswald story in 1963, there are verifiable fatal errors which ultimately prove
the little white lie was solely the work of members of the media. Only they had access, and only they had the methods and
means. The little white lie was about Barbara Olson, a conservative commentator for CNN and wife of US Solicitor General
Ted Olson. Now deceased, Mrs. Olson is alleged to have twice called her husband from an American Airlines Flight 77 seat-telephone,
before the aircraft slammed into the Pentagon. This unsubstantiated claim, reported by CNN remarkably quickly at 2.06 am EDT
[0606 GMT] on September 12, was the solitary foundation on which the spurious "Hijacker" story was built. Without the "eminent"
Barbara Olson and her alleged emotional telephone calls, there would never be any proof that humans played a role in the hijack
and destruction of the four aircraft that day. Look-alike claims surfaced several days later on September 16 about passenger
Todd Beamer and others, but it is critically important to remember here that the Barbara Olson story was the only one on September
11 and. 12. It was beyond question the artificial "seed" that started the media snowball rolling down the hill. And once
the snowball started rolling down the hill, it artfully picked up Osama Bin Laden and a host of other "terrorists" on the
way. By noon on September 12, every paid glassy-eyed media commentator in America was either spilling his guts about those
"Terrible Muslim hijackers", or liberating hitherto classified information about Osama Bin Laden. "Oh sure, it was Bin Laden,"
they said blithely, oblivious to anything apart from their television appearance fees. The deliberate little white lie
was essential. Ask yourself: What would most Americans have been thinking about on September 12, if CNN had not provided this
timely fiction? Would anyone anywhere have really believed the insane government story about failed Cessna pilots with box
cutters taking over heavy jets, then hurling them expertly around the sky like polished Top Guns from the film of the same
name? Of course not! As previously stated there would have been no Osama Bin Laden, and no "War on Terror" in Afghanistan
and occupied Palestine. This report is designed to examine the sequence of the Olson events and lay them bare for public
examination. Dates and times are of crucial importance here, so if this report seems tedious try to bear with me. Before moving
on to discuss the impossibility of the alleged calls, we first need to examine how CNN managed to "find out" about them, reported
here in the September 12 CNN story at 2.06 am EDT: "Barbara Olson, a conservative commentator and attorney, alerted her
husband, Solicitor General Ted Olson, that the plane she was on was being hijacked Tuesday morning, Ted Olson told CNN. Shortly
afterwards Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon" … "Ted Olson told CNN that his wife said all passengers and flight personnel,
including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers. The only weapons she mentioned were knives
and cardboard cutters. She felt nobody was in charge and asked her husband to tell the pilot what to do." At no point in
the above report does CNN quote Ted Olson directly. If the report was authentic and 100% attributable, it would have been
phrased quite differently. Instead of "Ted Olson told CNN that his wife said all passengers and flight personnel…",
the passage would read approximately:- Mr. Olson told CNN, "My wife said all passengers and flight personnel…" Whoever
wrote this story was certainly not in direct contact with US Solicitor General Ted Olson. Think about it, people! If you
knew or suspected your spouse’s aircraft had just fireballed inside the Pentagon building, how would you spend the rest
of the day? Initially you would certainly be in deep shock and unwilling to believe the reports. Then you would start to gather
your wits together, a slow process in itself. After that and depending on individual personality, you might drive over to
the Pentagon on the off chance your spouse survived the horrific crash, or you might go home and wait for emergency services
to bring you the inevitable bad news. As a matter of record, Ted Olson did not return to work until six days later. About
the last thing on your mind [especially if you happened to be the US Solicitor General], would be to pick up a telephone and
call the CNN Atlanta news desk in order to give them a "scoop". As a seasoned politician you would already know that all matters
involving national security must first be vetted by the National Security Council. Under the extraordinary circumstances and
security overkill existing on September 11, this vetting process would have taken a minimum of two days, and more likely three. The
timing of the CNN news release about Barbara Olson, is therefore as impossible as the New Zealand press release back in 1963
about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. As reported independently by Colonel Fletcher Prouty USAF (Retired),
whoever set Kennedy up, accidentally launched a full international newswire biography on obscure "killer" Lee Harvey Oswald,
without first taking the trouble to check his world clock. It was still "yesterday" in New Zealand on the other side of
the International Date Line when the biography was wired from New York, enabling the Christchurch Star newspaper was able
to print a story about Oswald as the prime suspect in its morning edition, several hours before he was first accused of the
crime by Dallas police. If the CNN story about Ted Olson had been correct, and he really had called them about Barbara
on September 11, then he would most surely have followed the telephone call up a few days later with a tasteful "one-on-one"
television interview, telling the hushed and respectful interviewer about how badly he missed his wife, and about the sheer
horror of it all. There is no record of any such interview in the CNN or other archives. Indeed, if you key "Barbara Olson"
into the CNN search engine, it returns only two related articles. The first is the creative invention on September 12 at 2.06
am EDT [0606 GMT], and the second is on December 12, about President Bush, who led a White House memorial that began at 8:46
a.m. EST, the moment the first hijacked plane hit the World Trade Center three months before. CNN includes this comment about
Ted Olson: "In a poignant remembrance at the Justice Department, U.S. Solicitor General Theodore Olson referred to "the
sufferings we have all experienced." He made no direct reference to the death of his wife, Barbara Olson, who was a passenger
aboard the American Airlines flight that crashed into the Pentagon…" Regarding the same event, Fox News reports that,
extraordinarily, Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson then said Barbara Olson's call, made "in the midst of terrible danger
and turmoil swirling around her," was a "clarion call that awakened our nation's leaders to the true nature of the events
of Sept. 11." So Ted Olson avoided making any direct personal reference to the death of his wife. Clearly this was not
good enough for someone somewhere. By the sixth month anniversary of the attack, Ted Olson was allegedly interviewed by London
Telegraph reporter Toby Harnden, with his exclusive story "She Asked Me How To Stop The Plane" appearing in that London newspaper
on March 5, thereafter renamed and syndicated around dozens of western countries as "Revenge Of The Spitfire", finally appearing
in the West Australian newspaper on Saturday March 23, 2002. I have diligently tried to find a copy of this story in an
American newspaper but have so far failed. The reasons for this rather perverse "external" publication of Ted Olson’s
story are not yet clear, but it seems fair to observe that if he is ever challenged by a Senate Select Committee about the
veracity of his claims, the story could not be used against him because it was published outside American sovereign territory. Regardless
of the real reason or reasons for its publication, the story seems to have matured a lot since the first decoy news release
by CNN early on September 12, 2001. Here we have considerably more detail, some of which is frankly impossible. In the alleged
words of US Solicitor General Theodore Olson: "She [Barbara] had trouble getting through, because she wasn’t using
her cell phone – she was using the phone in the passengers’ seats," said Mr. Olson. "I guess she didn’t
have her purse, because she was calling collect, and she was trying to get through to the Department of Justice, which is
never very easy." … "She wanted to know ‘What can I tell the pilot? What can I do? How can I stop this?’
" "What Can I tell the pilot?" Yes indeed! The forged Barbara Olson telephone call claims that the flight deck crew were
with her at the back of the aircraft, presumably politely ushered down there by the box cutter-wielding Muslim maniacs, who
for some bizarre reason decided not to cut their throats on the flight deck. Have you ever heard anything quite so ridiculous? But
it is at this juncture that we finally have the terminal error. Though the American Airlines Boeing 757 is fitted with individual
telephones at each seat position, they are not of the variety where you can simply pick up the handset and ask for an operator.
On many aircraft you can talk from one seat to another in the aircraft free of charge, but if you wish to access the outside
world you must first swipe your credit card through the telephone. By Ted Olson’s own admission, Barbara did not have
a credit card with her. It gets worse. On American Airlines there is a telephone "setup" charge of US$2.50 which can only
be paid by credit card, then a US$2.50 (sometimes US$5.00) charge per minute of speech thereafter. The setup charge is the
crucial element. Without paying it in advance by swiping your credit card you cannot access the external telephone network.
Under these circumstances the passengers’ seat phone on a Boeing 757 is a much use as a plastic toy. Perhaps Ted
Olson made a mistake and Barbara managed to borrow a credit card from a fellow passenger? Not a chance. If Barbara had done
so, once swiped through the phone, the credit card would have enabled her to call whoever she wanted to for as long as she
liked, negating any requirement to call collect. Sadly perhaps, the Olson telephone call claim is proved untrue. Any American
official wishing to challenge this has only to subpoena the telephone company and Justice Department records. There will be
no charge originating from American Airlines 77 to the US Solicitor General. Even without this hard proof, the chances
of meaningfully using a seat-telephone on Flight 77 were nil. We know from the intermittent glimpses of the aircraft the air
traffic controllers had on the radar scopes, that Flight 77 was travelling at extreme speed at very low level, pulling high
"G’ turns in the process. Under these circumstances it would be difficult even reaching a phone, much less using
it. Finally, the phones on the Boeing 757 rely on either ground cell phone towers or satellite bounce in order to maintain
a stable connection. At very low altitude and extreme speed, the violent changes in aircraft attitude would render the normal
telephone links completely unusable. Exactly the same applies with United Airlines Flight 93 that crashed before reaching
any targets. The aircraft was all over the place at extreme speed on radar, but as with Flight 77 we are asked to believe
that the "hijackers" allowed a passenger called Todd Beamer to place a thirteen minute telephone call. Very considerate of
them. The Pittsburg Channel put it this way in a story first posted at 1.38 pm EDT on September 16, 2001: "Todd Beamer
placed a call on one of the Boeing 757's on-board telephones and spoke for 13 minutes with GTE operator Lisa D. Jefferson,
Beamer's wife said. He provided detailed information about the hijacking and -- after the operator told him about the morning's
World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks - said he and others on the plane were planning to act against the terrorists aboard."
Note here that Mrs. Lisa Beamer did not receive a telephone call from Todd personally, but was later "told" by an operator
that her husband had allegedly called. Just another unfortunate media con job for the trash can. As previously stated it
is the Barbara Olson story that really counts, a view reinforced by the recent antics of the London print media. The photo
at the top of this page is a copy of that printed in the West Australian newspaper. You only have to study it closely for
a second to realize its full subliminal potential. Here is a studious and obviously very honest man. The US Solicitor General
sits in front of a wall lined with leather-bound volumes of Supreme Court Arguments, with a photo of his dead wife displayed
prominently in front of him. Does anyone out there seriously believe that this man, a bastion of US law, would tell even a
minor lie on a matter as grave as national security? Theodore Olson’s own words indicate that he would be prepared
to do rather more than that On March 21, 2002 on its page A35, the Washington Post newspaper printed an article titled "The
Limits of Lying" by Jim Hoagland, who writes that a statement by Solicitor General Theodore Olson in the Supreme Court has
the ring of perverse honesty. Addressing the Supreme Court of the United States of America, US Solicitor General Theodore
Olson said it is "easy to imagine an infinite number of situations . . . where government officials might quite legitimately
have reasons to give false information out." http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steveseymour/lies911/lies.htm
http://mdw.army.mil/news/Contingency_Planning.html (note: page is not being displayed)
Pentagon MASCAL exercise
simulates scenarios in preparing for emergencies
Military District of Washington - News: Contingency planning
PENTAGRAM
[actual title of official newsletter!] DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NEWS Washington, D.C., Nov. 3, 2000
The fire and
smoke from the downed passenger aircraft billows from the Pentagon courtyard. Defense Protective Services Police seal
the crash sight. Army medics, nurses and doctors scramble to organize aid. An Arlington Fire Department chief dispatches
his equipment to the affected areas.
Don Abbott, of Command Emergency Response Training, walks over to the Pentagon
and extinguishes the flames. The Pentagon was a model and the "plane crash" was a simulated one.
The Pentagon Mass
Casualty Exercise, as the crash was called, was just one of several scenarios that emergency response teams were exposed
to Oct. 24-26 in the Office of the Secretaries of Defense conference room.
On Oct. 24, there was a mock terrorist
incident at the Pentagon Metro stop and a construction accident to name just some of the scenarios that were practiced
to better prepare local agencies for real incidents.
To conduct the exercise, emergency personnel hold radios that
are used to rush help to the proper places, while toy trucks representing rescue equipment are pushed around the exercise table.
Cards
are then passed out to the various players designating the number of casualties and where they should be sent in a given scenario.
To
conduct the exercise, a medic reports to Army nurse Maj. Lorie Brown a list of 28 casualties so far. Brown then contacts
her superior on the radio, Col. James Geiling, a doctor in the command room across the hall.
Geiling approves
Brown's request for helicopters to evacuate the wounded. A policeman in the room recommends not moving bodies and Abbott,
playing the role of referee, nods his head in agreement.
"If you have to move dead bodies to get to live bodies, that's okay,"
Abbott says as the situation unfolds.
Geiling remarked on the importance of such exercises.
"The most important
thing is who are the players?" Geiling said. "And what is their modus operandi?" Brown thought the exercise was excellent
preparation for any potential disasters.
"This is important so that we're better prepared," Brown said. "This is
to work out the bugs. Hopefully it will never happen, but this way we're prepared."
An Army medic found the practice
realistic.
"You get to see the people that we'll be dealing with and to think about the scenarios and what you would
do," Sgt. Kelly Brown said. "It's a real good scenario and one that could happen easily."
A major player in the
exercise was the Arlington Fire Department.
Our role is fire and rescue," Battalion Chief R.W. Cornwell said. "We
get to see how each other operates and the roles and responsibilities of each. You have to plan for this. Look at all the
air traffic around here."
Each participant was required to fill out an evaluation form after the training exercise.
We
go over scenarios that are germane to the Pentagon," Jake Burrell of the Pentagon Emergency Management Team said. 'You
play the way you practice. We want people to go back to their organizations and look at their S.O.P. (standard operating procedure)
and see how they responded to any of the incidents."
Burrell has coordinated these exercises for four years and he remarked
that his team gets better each year.
Abbott, in his after action critique, reminded the participants that the actual
disaster is only one-fifth of the incident and that the whole emergency would run for seven to 20 days and might involve
as many as 17 agencies.
The emergency to a certain extent is the easiest part, Abbott said. He reminded the group
of the personal side of a disaster. Families wanting to come to the crash sight for closure.
In this particular
crash there would have been 341 victims.
(Ryan is a staff writer with the Fort Myer Military Community's Pentagram.)
*******************************
PENTAGON
Official Facts & Figures
U.S. Department of Defense
The Pentagon—a building, institution, and symbol—was
conceived at the request of Brigadier General Brehon B. Sommervell, Chief of the Construction Division of the Office
of the Quartermaster General, on a weekend in mid-July 1941. The purpose was to provide a temporary solution to the
War Department's critical shortage of space. The groundbreaking ceremony took place on September 11, 1941. The building
was dedicated on January 15, 1943, nearly 16 months to the day after the groundbreaking.
Prime contract awarded
11 August 1941 Mechanical engineering contract awarded 3 September 1941 Construction began 11 September 1941
===================================================
Dragon
eating World Trade Center is chosen as logo for US Marine Corps Urban Warfare both BEFORE and AFTER 9-11-2001... http://www.mcwl.quantico.usmc.mil/images/downloads/urbwarlogo.jpg
World
Trade Center type building in gunsight crosshairs is chosen as logo for US Marine Corps Operation METROPOLIS both BEFORE
and AFTER 9-11-2001... http://www.mcwl.quantico.usmc.mil/images/downloads/prometlogo.jpg
US Marine Corps
Operation is playing with urban nukes... http://www.mcwl.quantico.usmc.mil/images/downloads/ostilogo.jpg
Inverted
Pentagram chosen as logo for Pentagon autopsies... http://jag.cami.jccbi.gov./cariprofile.asp
===================================================
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=11897568&method=full&siteid=50143
<http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=11897568&method=full&siteid=50143>
PENTAGON
CHIEFS PLANNED FOR JET ATTACK
MILITARY chiefs were so convinced terrorists could fly a plane into the Pentagon
that they planned for an attack.
Almost 11 months before the September 11 suicide mission killed 189 people at America's
defence headquarters, they carried out a detailed emergency exercise.
US authorities have consistently claimed they
had no idea al-Qaeda was thinking of crashing planes into buildings. President Bush insists no one ever had considered
such a devastating attack.
But a report reveals that between October 24 and 26 2000, military planners held an
exercise to prepare for "incidents including a passenger plane crashing into the Pentagon".
The report in an internal
Pentagon newspaper reads like an account of what actually happened: "The fire and smoke from the downed aircraft billows
from the courtyard.
"Defence Protective Services Police seal the crash site. Army medics, nurses and doctors scramble
to organise aid ... Fire Department chief dispatches his equipment."
Democrats said the Mass Casualty Exercise added
to proof that different arms of government did not know what others were doing.
Senator Bob Graham, who chairs the
Senate Intelligence Committee, said: "We have a lot of information coming but it is not going to the same source for
analysis.
"So A knows part one, B knows part two and C knows part three but nobody knows all the parts."
Pentagon
emergency planning spokesman Glen Flood said: "We had been aware there could be possible aeroplane accidents and we have
had various tabletop exercises."
The hijackers of the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania intended to hit the White
House, it was revealed.
White House sources said the information had come from Abu Zubaydah, a senior al-Qaeda terrorist
who is being questioned at an undisclosed destination.
The White House faced more embarrassment after the independent Centre
for Immigration Studies said at least half the 48 Muslim militants linked to terrorist plots in the US since 1993 had broken
or abused immigration laws to stay in America.
=================================================
http://wbz4.com/news/StoryFolder/story_704640386_html
Agency
Planned Exercise On Sept. 11 Built Around A Plane Crashing Into A Building
Aug 21, 2002 10:00 pm US/Eastern
(AP)-(Washington)-In
what the government describes as a bizarre coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last
Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft crashed into one of its buildings. But the cause wasn't terrorism -- it was to
be a simulated accident.
Officials at the Chantilly, Va.-based National Reconnaissance Office had scheduled an exercise
that morning in which a small corporate jet crashed into one of the four towers at the agency's headquarters building after
experiencing a mechanical failure.
The agency is about four miles from the runways of Washington Dulles International
Airport.
Agency chiefs came up with the scenario to test employees' ability to respond to a disaster, said spokesman
Art Haubold. To simulate the damage from the plane, some stairwells and exits were to be closed off, forcing employees
to find other ways to evacuate the building.
"It was just an incredible coincidence that this happened to involve
an aircraft crashing into our facility," Haubold said. "As soon as the real world events began, we canceled the exercise."
Terrorism
was to play no role in the exercise, which had been planned for several months, he said.
Adding to the coincidence,
American Airlines Flight 77 -- the Boeing 767 that was hijacked and crashed into the Pentagon -- took off from Dulles
at 8:10 a.m. on Sept. 11, 50 minutes before the exercise was to begin. It struck the Pentagon around 9:40 a.m., killing
64 aboard the plane and 125 on the ground.
The National Reconnaissance Office operates many of the nation's spy satellites.
It draws its personnel from the military and the CIA.
After the Sept. 11 attacks, most of the 3,000 people who work
at agency headquarters were sent home, save for some essential personnel, Haubold said.
An announcement for an
upcoming homeland security conference in Chicago first noted the exercise.
In a promotion for speaker John Fulton,
a CIA officer assigned as chief of NRO's strategic gaming division, the announcement says, "On the morning of September
11th 2001, Mr. Fulton and his team ... were running a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues
that would be created if a plane were to strike a building. Little did they know that the scenario would come true in
a dramatic way that day."
The conference is being run by the National Law Enforcement and Security Institute.
====================================================
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=524&u=/ap/20020821/ap_wo_en_po/us_sept_11_plane_exercise_1&printer=1
<http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=524&u=/ap/20020821/ap_wo_en_po/us_sept_11_plane_exercise_1&printer=1>
Yahoo!
News Thursday, August 22, 2002
Agency planned exercise on Sept. 11 built around a plane crashing into a building
Wed
Aug 21, 7:45 PM ET
By JOHN J. LUMPKIN, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - In what the government describes
as a bizarre coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft
would crash into one of its buildings. But the cause wasn't terrorism — it was to be a simulated accident.
Officials
at the Chantilly, Virginia-based National Reconnaissance Office had scheduled an exercise that morning in which a small
corporate jet would crash into one of the four towers at the agency's headquarters building after experiencing a mechanical
failure.
The agency is about 4 miles (6 kilometers) from the runways of Washington Dulles International Airport.
Agency
chiefs came up with the scenario to test employees' ability to respond to a disaster, said spokesman Art Haubold.
No
actual plane was to be involved — to simulate the damage from the crash, some stairwells and exits were to be closed off,
forcing employees to find other ways to evacuate the building.
"It was just an incredible coincidence that this
happened to involve an aircraft crashing into our facility," Haubold said. "As soon as the real world ( news - Y!
TV) events began, we canceled the exercise."
Terrorism was to play no role in the exercise, which had been planned
for several months, he said.
Adding to the coincidence, American Airlines Flight 77 — the Boeing 767 that
was hijacked and crashed into the Pentagon ( news - web sites) — took off from Dulles at 8:10 a.m. on Sept. 11,
50 minutes before the exercise was to begin. It struck the Pentagon around 9:40 a.m., killing 64 aboard the plane and 125
on the ground.
The National Reconnaissance Office operates many of the nation's spy satellites. It draws its personnel
from the military and the CIA ( news - web sites).
After the Sept. 11 attacks, most of the 3,000 people who work
at agency headquarters were sent home, save for some essential personnel, Haubold said.
An announcement for an
upcoming homeland security conference in Chicago first noted the exercise.
In a promotion for speaker John Fulton,
a CIA officer assigned as chief of NRO's strategic gaming division, the announcement says, "On the morning of September
11th 2001, Mr. Fulton and his team ... were running a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues
that would be created if a plane were to strike a building. Little did they know that the scenario would come true in
a dramatic way that day."
The conference is being run by the National Law Enforcement and Security Institute.
On
the Net:
National Reconnaissance Office: http://www.nro.gov
Central Intelligence Agency: http://www.cia.gov
National
Law Enforcement and Security Institute: http://www.nlsi.net
=======================================================
PENTAGON'S
ROBOT BOMBERS SINCE WORLD WAR ONE http://geocities.com/killer_robot_jetplanes (PIRATE NEWS - SEPTEMBER 911 SURPRISE
- NEWS ARCHIVE)
**************************************
http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/ind/uvind.htm
US
Air Force Museum Unpiloted Vehicles Index [photos and details of these war-worn handymanless gadgets]
Unpiloted
Vehicles (Drones)
Beechcraft MQM-107 "Streaker"
Beechcraft QU-22B [converted 6 seater Bonanza "private plane"...]
Bell
XGAM-63 "Rascal" (surface to air with nuclear warhead, 1946)
Boeing AGM-86B (ALCM) Air-Launched Cruise Missile
YCGM-121B
Boeing Robotic Air Vehicle (recon, 1972)
Boeing YQM-94A "Compass Cope B"
Culver PQ-14B (practice target, private
civilian aircraft, retractable gear, 1940)
Dart Aerial Gunnery Target (tow target, 1968)
General Atomics
RQ-1 "Predator" (recon, bomber, 1994)
Ground Launched Cruise Missile (deployed in Europe for NATO, nuclear warhead,
1983)
Kettering Aerial Torpedo "Bug" (Ground Launched Cruise Missle, World War One, 1918)
Lockheed D-21B
[1/3rd of Mach 3 SR-71, recon, 1964]
Lockheed Martin-Boeing RQ-3A "DarkStar" (1996)
McDonnell ADM-20 "Quail"
(air launched decoy with identical RADAR image of airliner-sized B-52)
North American AGM-28B "Hound Dog" (air-launched
supersonic missile, destroy heavily-defended ground targets, 1959)
Northrop AGM-136A "Tacit Rainbow" (Air-launched,
circle, locate and destroy ground RADAR, 1984)
Radioplane OQ-2A Radio-Controlled Aerial Target (Small private civilian
plane size, target practice, 1935)
Republic/Ford Aerospace JB-2 "Loon" (Pentagon version of NAZI V-1 Buzz Bomb Cruise
Missle, DURING World War Two, January 1945)
Ryan AQM-34N Reconnaissance Drone (60,000 foot altitude, Vietnam-China
War recon, 1969
Ryan BQM-34 "Firebee" (remote-controlled target drone, 1958)
Ryan BQM-34F "Firebee II" (high-speed
target drone, 1960)
Teledyne Ryan AQM-34L "Firebee" (supersonic target drone)
Teledyne Ryan AQM-81A (Tiny Mach
4+ rocket target drone, 100,000+ altitude, 1979)
Teledyne-Ryan AQM-91A "Compass Arrow" (stealth Recon drone in China
during Vietnam-China Wars)
See also... Missiles
=========================================
LA
PENTAGATE Missing Boeing 757 makes 5 foot hole in Pentagon http://trans.voila.fr/ano?anolg=65544&anourl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.effroyable-imposture.net%2Fdocs%2Frubrique.php3%3Fid_rubrique%3D22
<http://trans.voila.fr/ano?anolg=65544&anourl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.effroyable-imposture.net%2Fdocs%2Frubrique.php3%3Fid_rubrique%3D22>
PIRATE NEWS - PENTAGON PACIFIED BY AA77? Official conspiracy theory by US gov't alleges Saudi agents attacked
USA on 911 (they ought to know since they trained them at US military bases), even after 7 alleged hijackers turn up alive
and well. Now that's what I call a bold-faced "conspiracy theory!" Or is "conspiracy factory" a more plausible description? http://geocities.com/s911surprise3b/american_airlines_flight_77
US
invented air attack on Pentagon, claims French book http://www.guardian.co.uk/september11/story/0,11209,677112,00.html
"It's
easy to imagine an infinite number of situations where the government might legitimately give out false information. It's
an unfortunate reality that the issuance of incomplete information and even misinformation by government may sometimes
be perceived as necessary to protect vital interests." —US Solicitor-General Theodore "Ted" Olson, Harbury vs.
United States, US Supreme Court, 17 March 2002 (Olson's 3rd wife Barbara, an ex-federal prosecutor and CNN pundit, was
allegedly murdered on the invisible American Airlines Flight 77 that didn't crash into the Pentagon). Mrs. Harbury argued
her case pro se to the US Supreme Court regarding the US CIA murdering her husband in Central America http://
"It
was like a cruise missile with wings, went right there and slammed into the Pentagon," Mike Walter, an eyewitness, told
CNN. "Huge explosion, great ball of fire, smoke started billowing out, and then it was just chaos on the highway as
people either tried to move around the traffic and go down either forward or backwards." —CNN.COM, "Up to 800
possibly dead at Pentagon", September 12, 2001
Steve Patterson, 43, said he was watching television reports of the
World Trade Center being hit when he saw a silver commuter jet fly past the window of his 14th-floor apartment in Pentagon City.
The plane was about 150 yards away, approaching from the west about 20 feet off the ground, Patterson said. He said the plane,
which sounded like the high-pitched squeal of a fighter jet, flew over Arlington cemetary so low that he thought it was going
to land on I-395. He said it was flying so fast that he couldn't read any writing on the side. The plane, which appeared to
hold about eight to 12 people, headed straight for the Pentagon but was flying as if coming in for a landing on a nonexistent
runway, Patterson said. Eyewitness described a small jet aircraft seating a maximum of 12 passengers and crew, NOT an airliner,
flying "like a fighter jet" at high speed below treetop level. —News reports reposted on WhatReallyHappened.com
========================================
"There
are no innocent civilians..., so it doesn't bother me so much to be killing innocent bystanders." —General Curtis
E. LeMay, US Air Force Chief of Staff (1961 - 1965), Vice Presidential running mate of George Wallace (attempted assassination
resulting in paraplegia), National Journal, 11/26/94 http://www.af.mil/
"We could blow up a drone (unmannded)
vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. The presense of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel
could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The US could follow with an air/sea rescue
operation covered by US fighters to "evacuate" remaining members of the non-existant crew. Casualty lists in US newspapers
would cause a helpful wave of national indignation. We could develop a Communist Cuba terror campaign in the Miami area,
in other Flordia cities and even in Washington. The terror campaign could be pointed at Cuban refugees seeking haven
in the United States. We could sink a boatload of Cubans enroute to Florida (real or simulated). We could foster attempts on
lives of Cubans in the United States even to the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicized. Exploding a few bombs
in carefully chosen spots. The arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating cuban involvement.
Use of MIG-type aircraft by US pilots could provide additional provocation. Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface
shipping, and destruction of US military drone aircraft by MIG type planes would be useful. An F-86 properly painted would
convince air passengers that they saw a Cuban MIG, especially if the pilot of the transport were to announce that fact.
Hijacking attampts against US civil air and surface craft should be encouraged. It is possible to create an incident which would
demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civilian airliner from the United States.
An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging
to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be subsituted for the
actual civil aircraft and the passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft
would be converted to a drone. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow
a rondevous. From the rondevous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly
to an auxiliary airfield at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the
aircraft to its original status. Meanwhile the drone aircraft will continue to fly the filed flight plan. The drone
will be transmitting on the international distress frequency "MAY DAY" message stating it is under attack by Cuban MIG
aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by the destruction of aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal.
This will allow IACO radio stations to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to "sell" the
incident. It is possible to create an incident that will make it appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft
over international waters in an unprovoked attack. On one such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly Tail-end Charlie. While
near the Cuban island this pilot would broadcast that he had been jumped by MIGs and was going down. This pilot would then fly
at extremely low altitude and land at a secure base, an Eglin auxiliary. The aircraft would be met by the proper people, quickly
stored and given a new tail number. The pilot who performed the mission under an alias would resume his proper identity.
The pilot and aircraft would then have disappeared. A submarine or small craft would distribute F-101 parts, parachute, etc.
The pilots retuning to Homestead would have a true story as far as they knew. Search ships and aircraft could be dispatched and
parts of aircraft found. It is understood that the Department of State is also preparing suggested courses of action to develope
justification for US military intervention in Cuba." —General L. L. Limnitzer, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff TOP
SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING NOFORN The Joint Chiefs of Staff Pentagon, Washington DC Memorandum for the Secretary of
Defense Subject: Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba (TS) JCS to Secretary of War Robert McNamara March
13, 1962 (Operation NORTHWOODS Declassified in 2000 - pdf images of actual documents, 15 pages, 750kb) http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/doc1.pdf http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html http://www.geocities.com/x_files_lone_gunmen_911
"The
Pentagon—a building, institution, and symbol—was conceived at the request of Brigadier General Brehon B. Sommervell,
Chief of the Construction Division of the Office of the Quartermaster General, on a weekend in mid-July 1941. The purpose
was to provide a temporary solution to the War Department's critical shortage of space.The groundbreaking ceremony took
place on September 11, 1941. The building was dedicated on January 15, 1943, nearly 16 months to the day after the groundbreaking. Construction
began 11 September 1941." —The Pentagon: Headquarters for US Department of Defense, Facts & Figures, updated:
25-Oct-2000 https://www.dmdc.osd.mil/
=================================================
http://www.beyond2000.com/news/Nov_01/story_1302.html
Beyond
2000 - CORPORATE PREDATOR DRONES
22 November 2001 - "Aerospace giant Boeing has decided that it needs to give serious
thought to cutting pilots out of the cockpit. The company has established a new organisation dedicated to efforts in
the expanding 'unmanned systems' market and aimed at fast-tracking the development of pilotless aircraft. At one time,
the US military said it had no desire to allow unmanned aircraft to carry lethal payloads. However, following tests last year
with Predator UAV's firing Hellfire anti-tank missiles, and the subsequent deployment and success of the pairing in killing tanks
in Afghanistan, the Pentagon has warmed rapidly to the idea. The Boeing group will look at the feasibility of cheap, expendable
UAV's that could be sent on suicidal missions. Based in St.Louis, the new Unmanned Systems group will be headed up by Mike
Heinz and report to both Jerry Daniels, president and chief executive officer of Boeing Military Aircraft and Missile Systems,
and George Muellner, president, Boeing Phantom Works, the company's advanced research-and-development unit. 'Unmanned systems
are the future of aerospace,' Daniels said."
========================================
http://www.chicagotribune.com/technology/chi-0109280208sep28.story
War
on terror - Landing by remote control doesn't quite fly with pilots
By Jeff Long Tribune staff reporter Published
September 28, 2001
The military has been flying planes and landing them safely by remote control for years, but
airline pilots say questions about security must be answered before that technology is used aboard commercial jetliners
to thwart hijackers the way President Bush suggested Thursday during a speech in Chicago. Pentagon's Predator drone
attacks Afganistan and Iraq
"We will look at all kinds of technologies to make sure that our airlines are safe,"
Bush said at O'Hare International Airport. "... including technology to enable controllers to take over distressed aircraft
and land it by remote control."
Pilots said after the speech that though they support other proposals for airplane
security that Bush outlined, the idea of aircraft being remotely controlled concerns them.
"If the good guys can
take control of the plane" from the ground, said John Mazor, a spokesman for the Air Line Pilots Association, "maybe
the bad guys can take control of it too."
Taking control of a hijacked aircraft from the ground appears to be less
feasible than other measures, he said.
"We would view that as a very--very--long-term type of undertaking," Mazor
said. "There are enormous technical difficulties in trying to rig up an aircraft for that."
But companies that have
designed such systems for the military say it wouldn't be difficult to adapt the technology for commercial aircraft.
Why did USAF pilots name the 1950s designed Vietnam era F105 Thunderchief a THUD? Because it made a BIG THUD when it
hit the ground while using an autopilot with Low Altitude Terrain Following RADAR
General Atomics Aeronautical
Systems Inc. developed a remote-controlled reconnaissance plane for the Air Force called Predator, which flew in Bosnia
during the conflict there. Used by the military since 1994, it can be landed by pilots linked by satellite using controls
on the ground or ordering an onboard computer to do the job.
Tom Cassidy, president and CEO of the San Diego company,
said he sent Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta a letter shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks.
"Such a system
would not prevent a hijacker from causing mayhem on the aircraft or exploding a device and destroying the aircraft in
flight," the letter said, "but it would prevent him from flying the aircraft into a building or populated areas."
Cassidy
said Thursday that a pilot aboard a commercial airliner could turn the plane's guidance over to ground controllers at the press
of a button, preventing a hijacker--or anyone else aboard--from flying the plane.
That system also would keep people
on the ground from taking control of a plane away from the pilot, Cassidy said, because the pilot would first have to
give up control.
Aircraft anywhere in the nation could be remotely controlled from just one or two locations using
satellite links, Cassidy said. Those locations could be heavily fortified against terrorists.
"The technology is
available," Cassidy said. "We use it every day."
Copyright © 2002, Chicago Tribune
===========================================
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19842-2002Nov21.html http://www.darpa.mil/iao/TIASystems.htm
Someone
To Watch Over Us [Bush, a 4-time convicted felon, appoints 5-time convicted felon to spy on USA for Pentaon]
Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency http://www.darpa.mil http://jag.cami.jccbi.gov./cariprofile.asp
===========================================
POLICE
MENTALITY - A MILITARY PERSPECTIVE http://geocities.com/pentagon_whistleblower [Pentagon special forces rescued Colonel
Quadaffi before USAF and US Navy bombers attacked Libya, killing 40 sleeping civilians and 2 sleeping USAF F111 pilots
and 1 whistleblowing chief of public affairs for USMC at Pentagon in Al Gore's hometown, plus the REAL story behind
the historic firing of USAF chief of staff during Desert Storm]
Now let's look at the passengers
If there was a conspiracy with Flight 77, doesn't a lot of the following passengers fit the type of people
you would expect to have been involved in it?
Summary of Flight 77 passengers :
Total passengers: 64
Passengers involved in gov’t/defense related work: 21
Senior staff/directors/managers: 18
Military backgrounds: 10
Navy background: 7
Executives/chief officers/presidents: 5
Men: 30
Women: 24
Kids: 5
Non-hijacker passengers: 59
Alleged Hijackers*: 5
*Allegedly armed with only knifes and box cutters.
Is it a just coincidence the most of the passengers on Flight 77 with military backgrounds were Navy
and that the crash at the Pentagon happened in the Navy's command center which took the heaviest casualties?
Why didn't the passengers of Flight 77 rise up against the alleged hijackers like we are told the
passengers on Flight 93 did since they both knew the hijackers were going to kill them?
"Herded to the back of the plane by hijackers armed with knives and box-cutters, the passengers and
crew members of American Airlines Flight 77 -- including the wife of Solicitor General Theodore Olson -- were ordered to call relatives to say they were about to die." -Washington Post (09/12/01)
Is it really believable that all but one of the 64 passengers on Flight 77 were recovered at the
Pentagon when almost nothing of a plane was?
If some of the passengers where involved with this conspiracy, could they still be alive and living
under new identities? Where some of these passengers specifically selected to be on this flight as a way to eliminate them
for "knowing to much"?
1. Charles F. Burlingame III, 51, of Herndon, Virginia, was the Captain of Flight 77,
an aeronautical engineer, and a former Navy fighter pilot.
Pentagon Gives September 11 Pilot Arlington Plot "The U.S. Army agreed on Friday to allow the pilot of an American Airlines plane that hijackers crashed
into the Pentagon on September 11 to be buried in his own plot at Arlington National Cemetery. Under pressure from politicians
and the public, Army Secretary Thomas White said he would grant a waiver allowing Captain Charles Burlingame III to be buried
in his own plot at Arlington, sacred ground for American heroes. Under Arlington regulations, retired reservists must
turn 60 before they can be buried at Arlington National Cemetery, and Burlingame was only 52." -Arlington Cemetery (12/07/01)
Let's take a second to think about the above statement. How fucking American is that shit? It was
his own plot so why would anyone have to wait and be a certain age to be burried there. FUCK. He did 25 years in the Navy
for Gods sake, give him a damn funeral plot already, who cares.
I'm going to list some of the passengers as there are too many to go into detail here.
2. David Charlebois , 39, of Washington, D.C., was the First Officer of Flight 77. David Charlebois, the
co-pilot of American Airlines Flight 77, which crashed into the Pentagon, was openly Gay, the Washington Blade reported.
Charlebois was a member of the National Gay Pilots Association. Charlebois is survived by Tom Hay, his partner of almost
13 years.
. Mary Jane (MJ) Booth, 64, of Falls Church, Va., secretary for American Airline's general manager at Dulles Intl. Airport..
An American Airlines employee for 45 years, she worked
for more than 30 years as secretary to American's general manager at Dulles.
10. Bernard Brown Jr., 11, of Washington, D.C., student at Leckie Elementary School in Washington. He
was embarking on an educational trip to the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary near Santa Barbara, California, as part
of a program funded by the National Geographic Society.
His father, Bernard Sr., is a Navy chief petty officer who's works at the Pentagon and who's office is in
the wing where the crash happened. Bernard took a rare day off to play golf on 9/11. Had he not — he would
have been in his office at the Pentagon when the plane slammed in at 9:43.
Is it just the strangest of strange coincidences that Bernard Jr.'s dad gave a lecture to him about death
and dying the morning of his plane trip, took a "rare day off" that day from his office at the Pentagon, and that his son's
hijacked flight "crashed" in the very spot that his office was in?
WHAT THE HELL ..........
His father, a Navy chief petty officer , says he sat his son down on the morning of Sept. 11, and had
a serious talk with him about dangers he might encounter on the trip. " To be honest — totally honest —
we talked about death," he says. "And I just told him, ‘Don’t be afraid.’ Just because the events
that they were going to do were pretty dangerous. Just listen to what the people tell you, and the instructions, you’ll
be all right. You’ll be fine. He said ‘ Daddy, I’m scared,’ and I said, ‘hey, don’t
be scared, don’t be afraid to die. Because we all are going to die someday.’" Bernard’s mom Sinata Brown went to work. Her husband Bernard took a rare day
off to play golf. Had he not — he would have been in his office at the Pentagon when the plane slammed in
at 9:43. Sanita wasn’t really worried about her son either. After all, his flight had taken off an hour and a
half earlier. Tragically, his own son’s memorial is not the only one Bernard Brown expects to attend. That’s
because Flight 77 — the flight carrying Bernard Brown’s son — actually crashed into the wing of the Pentagon
where he works. Few of his colleagues survived. "One of my best friends, a guy who worked for me, a girl who was a
training officer," says Bernard. "Everybody on that, you know, people that worked in my area, everybody, all the Navy personnel
probably except for two or three I knew on that list. So, out of 30 something, how many that were in there, I knew every last
one of them." - MSN (09/25/01)
12. William E. Caswell, 54, Silver Spring, MD, physicist, was a senior scientist for the U.S. Navy, retired Army. A third-generation physicist whose work at the Navy was so
classified that his family knew very little about what he did each day. They don't even know exactly why he was
headed to Los Angeles on the doomed American Airlines Flight 77."It was a trip he often took," his mother, Jean Caswell,
said Friday. " We never knew what he was doing there because he couldn't say. You just learn not to ask questions." In
1983, Bill's career took an abrupt turn when he moved to the Naval Surface Weapons Center in Silver Spring, Maryland, to work on applying artificial intelligence and nonlinear dynamics to signal processing
problems. In 1985, he was invited by the navy to work as a civilian scientist on a major
classified defense technology project.
After being drafted into the Army during the Vietnam War, he resumed his studies at Princeton University, where he received
a Ph.D. in physics in 1975, specializing in elementary particle theory.
17. Eddie Dillard, 54, of Alexandria, VA, a retired Marketing Manager with Philip-Morris.
18. Charles Droz III, 52, of Springfield, VA, vice president
of software development for EM Solutions Inc. and retired Lieutenant Commander, Navy.
29. Bryan Jack, 48, of Alexandria, VA, was a senior executive at the Defense
Department.
39. Barbara Olson, 45, Great Falls, VA, an author, legal analyst and former
federal prosecutor and congressional lawyer, a conservative
commentator who often appeared on CNN, and was married
to U.S. Solicitor General Theodore Olson.
Ted Olson received two calls on this office telephone from his wife as her hijacked airplane headed toward the Pentagon. Theodore B. Olson, 42nd
Solicitor General (not on plane). (Click photo for bio.)
He successfully represented George W. Bush at the Supreme Court last December, stopping the Florida recounts and guaranteeing Bush
the White House.
He has said that officials have the right to lie to American citizens, telling the US Supreme Court that misleading statements are sometimes
needed to protect foreign policy interests.
If Ted Olson, the US Solicitor General and husband of Barbara Olson, admits that the US Government
gives out false information to American citizens, how can we be sure that the US Government is not giving out any false information
relating to the Pentagon crash, or that Mr. Olson is lying about receiving those alleged two collect phone calls from his
wife aboard Flight 77?
If Barbara Olson called from her cellphone, why did Ted Olson say she called collect?
How come Barbara Olson and Renee May were the only two of the 59 non-hijacker passengers on board
Flight 77--including many with military experience--that supposedly made phone calls from the plane even
after the alleged hijackers reportedly ordered all the passengers to call their loved ones to tell them they were all about
to die especially if Barbara Olson called collect?
How was Barbara able to make two phone calls when all the phone lines in the area were jammed?
"When the crash actually occurred at 9:38 a.m., all area communications seemed simultaneously overwhelmed.
Firefighters calling the ECC couldn’t get through. Relatives of Pentagon workers found cellular and land lines jammed.
Cellular telephones were virtually useless during the first few hours." -Arlington County After-Action
Report
|
|