Make your own free website on Tripod.com

The American truths behind 9/11, microchip, bohemian grove, skull and bones, pearl harbor, and more

9/11 and the WTC

Home
9/11 and the WTC
Pentagon and flight 77
Skull and Bones
Bohemian Grove
Bohemian Grove members list
The Microchip
WTC bombing 1993
Concentration Camps in America
Police State
New World Order
Fascism
The Constitution of The United States of America
The Bill of Rights
Patriot Act
Patriot Act 2
Calendar of Events

What if you found out that what happened on 9/11 isn't what it seemed? How would you feel? Betrayed maybe... you decide.

Note: this is not my original text, this information was received from various websites that you may find links to on this site.

There are several photos that go with this but they will placed at the bottom of the page.

Let's start with some of the points, I've noticed and pieced together through looking at sites and analyzing the info.
*There are only 7 hijackers total shown on camera. Possibly to establish a trail and history and the others to later support the idea that there were hijackers.

*Only 5 are supposedly shown getting on to a 9/11 Flight[Flt 77](again given to us 3 yrs later with no date/time stamp).

*2 (Atta and Alomari)[Flt 11] are shown at an ATM. Also at a gas station, and at a Portland, ME Airport

*BEFORE* 9/11. Atta is also shown at a Wal-Mart.

*Another 2 (Hanjour and Moqed)[Flt 77] are *also* shown at an ATM. And those same 2 are shown as part of the 5 supposedly shown at Dulles on a grainy video, with no date/time stamp, that was given to us 3 yrs later.

The only 4 shown on ATM close up cam:

NOTE: These same 7 who are the ONLY ones "shown on tape", are the same ones who got on planes (5 on AA77 and 2 on AA11) that were:

A) described as "small commuter planes"

B) considered 'Destroyed' according to FAA records, while they show the other two as active/still assigned(now "cancelled").

C)The two flights most accused of being smaller drones/modified military planes.

And the four who were the only ones initially shown to us on ATM, just happen to be 2 from each of these planes.

No surveillance video exists of any of the Flight 93 or 175 hijackers, either before 9/11 or *on* 9/11.

Isn't that odd?

Ok let's look at the individual hijackers...

Above are CCTV pictures released by the FBI supposedly showing Atta and Alomari at Portland Jetport on 9/11. *TWO* DATE/TIME STAMPS. Note their clothes.

Michael Tuohey’s brief encounter took place at the U.S. Airways ticket and baggage check-in at the airport in Portland, Maine. Working the ticket counter as he did most every morning for 37 years, he remembered two clean-shaven Arab-looking businessmen with tickets in hand (Atta and Alomari) approaching his workstation, both looking elegant and wearing suits and ties. [American Free Press]

So we have a clear contradiction. Here they are boarding the plane in Portland ME, wearing dress shirts NOT suits and ties.

I'm not going to go into Atta's history or his father's claim that he called him after 9/11.

Atta at Wal-Mart, 20 minutes:


Atta (and Alomari) at the Gas Station:

Let's now focus on Abdulaziz Alomari...


-First the FBI went after *Abdul Rahman Alomari* (A Saudi Airlines Pilot). Here's what the flight manifest the Boston Globe shows up as:

 



 

-That leads to Adnan Bukhari, who lived next door, another pilot trainee. But they turn out to be clean and alive. And not related to 9/11. How did they end up at Adnan Bukhari?


[Adnan and Ameer Bukhari's] names had been tied to a car found at an airport in Portland, Maine. But Bukhari's attorney said it appeared their identifications were stolen and said Bukhari had no role in the hijackings.

The Mitsubishi(Nissan Altima) sedan sources said was rented by Atta, contained materials written in Arabic, including flight manuals, that law enforcement sources called "helpful" to the investigation.[
CNN]

The two rented a car, a silver-blue Nissan Altima, from an Alamo car rental at Boston's Logan Airport and drove to an airport in Portland, Maine, where they got on US Airways Flight 5930 at 6 a.m. Tuesday headed back to Boston, the sources said.

Before CNN learned the identities of the two brothers, Portland Police Chief Mike Chitwood said, "I can tell you those two individuals did get on a plane and fly to Boston early yesterday morning ... I can tell you that they are the focus of a federal investigation." [People's Daily 9/13/2001]

A trail of evidence led investigators into Tuesday's terrorist attacks from one abandoned rental car in Portland, Maine, to two houses in Vero Beach, Florida. One of the Vero Beach houses had been rented by two brothers from Saudi Arabia. Inside it were two pilot's certificates in the names of Adnan Bukhari and his brother, Ameer Abbas Bukhari. [BBC News]
And what about this car? WRH.com points out some interesting oddities...

(Mohamed) Atta and (Abdulaziz) Alomari boarded a 6:00 a.m. flight from Portland to Boston's Logan International Airport. [SFGate]

A Mitsubishi sedan [Atta] rented was found at Boston's Logan Airport. Arabic language materials were found in the car. [CNN]

How did Atta leave a rental car at Logan Airport in Boston when he supposedly flew there from Portland, Maine?

The official story:


[Atta] rented a car at Logan Airport Alamo and drove to Maine [on September 10]. Then flew down from Portland, Maine, early Tuesday before connecting on Flight 11. [Boston.com]

Why would Atta leave a rental car containing incriminating evidence at Logan Airport, rent another car in Boston to drive to Maine, then fly back to Boston again?

Even the 9/11 Commission couldn't explain this conundrum...


Atta picked up Omari at another hotel [on September 10], and the two drove to Portland, Maine, for reasons that remain unknown. [9/11 Commission Report]

...and they didn't look for answers.

The Bukharis provide(d) a key to the enigma


Early accounts stated it was Adnan and Ameer Bukhari who rented the car from Logan Airport Alamo and abandoned it at Portland, not Mohamed Atta. The Bukharis "did get on a plane and fly to Boston", Adnan Bukhari's name reportedly appeared on Flight 11's manifest, and a trail of evidence led investigators to Adnan Bukhari's house.

Within hours of the attacks it was nearly "case closed" that the Bukharis were hijackers of Flight 11, but a couple of simple facts proved their innocence - Ameer Bukhari died in a plane crash in 2000 and Adnan Bukhari is alive.

Bukhari's name appears on Flight 11's manifest???

By Associated Press

(Miami-AP)9/14/01

The Saudi flight engineer and Flight Safety Academy student lived next to Abdul Alomari. His name reportedly appears on the American Airlines Flight Eleven manifest. Alomari has not been located since the attacks.

http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/2001-09-14/usw_nosuspect.asp

-Then they name "Abdulaziz Alomari", the Saudi Engineer.

"I couldn't believe it when the FBI put me on their list. They gave my name and my date of birth, but I am not a suicide bomber. I am here. I am alive. I have no idea how to fly a plane. I had nothing to do with this."

Mr Al-Omari said his passport was stolen when his apartment in Denver, Colorado, was burgled in 1995. He had been studying engineering at Denver University since 1993. He was given a new passport in Riyadh on December 31, 1995 and returned to America to resume his studies in January 1996. [Telegraph]


So, how did we get from Abdulrahman Alomari to Abulaziz Alomari? That seems to be the missing link. Finally when they provide us a final picture this is where it gets really strange.

The official photograph used to this date of Abdulaziz Alomari:

The other "Alomari":

www.fbi.gov/pressrel/ pressrel01/100401picts.htm

(hmm, after pointing this out to Mike at 911myths.com, that link is gone)

These are NOT the same person:


(there is another picture that goes with this one but I couldn't get it to work)

Here is the hijacker martyr farewell clip(we will get more into this as well) released September 10th, 2002:

Who does that look like? It looks like the one with the white background, the photo which is hardly used. The one in the ATM photo, the white background id photo, the Portland Airport video, and this farewell clip are all the same person. But it is NOT the person with the red background. If that is even a real person.

Even Wikipedia airs a little of the mystery:

History

Little is known about al-Omari's life, and it is unclear whether some information refers to al-Omari or another person by that name. He has used birth dates of December 24, 1972 and May 28, 1979. He came from Asir Province, a poor region in southwestern Saudi Arabia that borders Yemen. According to a 2003 CIA report, he had graduated with honours from high school, attained a degree from the Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, was married, and had a daughter.


I guess the "CIA" had plenty of time by 2003 to *create* a history for their Alomari.

Would you believe on this *undated/without time code stamp* grainy surveillance video, given to us 3 yrs later, it shows "Hani Hanjour", pictured all the way to the right:

"Nawaf Alhazmi" gets searched, "Khalid Almihdhar", and "Hani Hanjour".


Hani Hanjour, who is thinly built, with a long face and a high hairline:


THAT IS NOT HANI HANJOUR.


Hijacker brothers "Nawaf Alhazmi" (blue shirt) and "Salem" (white shirt) pass through security in Dulles Airport in Washington.

Salem Alhazmi

Possible mistaken identity. Then why do they still use the name and where did they get his photo:

The real Salem Al-Hazmi, however, is alive and indignant in Saudi Arabia, and not one of the people who perished in the American Airlines flight that crashed on the Pentagon. He works at a government-owned petroleum and chemical plant in the city of Yanbu.


"The Salem Al-Hamzi we have is 26 years old and has never been to the United States, " Gaafar Allagany told the Washington Post. "He has said he is willing to come to the United States if anyone wants to see him."

This man, named Salem al-Hazmi, is alive, and has spoken to the press since the September 11 attacks.


And yet in the Martyr video...THEY USE THE SAME MAN WHO IS ALIVE TO REPRESENT SALEM AL-HAZMI:

He claimed that his passport had been stolen by a pickpocket in Cairo three years before, and that the pictures and details such as date of birth released to the public by the FBI are indeed his. He also stated that he had never visited the United States, but volunteered to fly to the U.S. to prove his innocence.[2] In a later report from the Saudi Gazette he emphasized that he in fact has never lost his passport nor has he visited the US since last August, except for a 45-day refresher course. [b]His picture was published on September 19, 2001, in the Saudi newspaper Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, alongside that of the man the Saudis believed to be the dead terrorist using al-Hazmi's name and identity, Badr Alhazmi.


Who is Badr Alhazmi?

Is this who the Saudi's were talking about?


Dr. Al-Badr Al-Hazmi hugs a friend at the Islamic Center in San Antonio. He was held for two weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks before being released.


http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/40917_doctor01.shtml


Dr Al-Badr Al-Hazmi who works (or worked) at the U.T. Health Science Center (1), which is located close to Lackland Airforce Base, San Antonio (2).


·Al-Hazmi's credit card was used by two of the hijackers to buy their plane tickets (2).


Two men named Saeed Alghamdi (Hijacker suspect on flight 93) and Ahmed Alghamdi (Flight 175) had previously attended Lackland Airforce Base for training (2).


The FBI stated that Dr Al-Hazmi had used the alias Khalid Al Midhar (Hijacker on flight 77) (4). Is this the reason the FBI now think the real Khalid Al Midhar is still alive?


USA Today reported: Law enforcement documents obtained by USA TODAY suggest that Alhazmi has used false identification bearing the name of another hijacker, Khalid al Midhar (10). Are we looking at something similar to Azmath and Shah? Were Azmath and Shah on their way to meet him?


Dr Al Hazmi was held from Sept 12th to 24th without access to counsel and his detention location was kept secret (3).

So now we have three hijacker names linked to San Antonio and a military base. How could Al Qaeda have gained access to Lackland Air force Base, Al-Hazmi's credit card and presumably classified information about previous students?


http://team8plus.org/content.php?article.21

I don't know.


But wikipedia definitely makes mention of this...


Not My Sons, Says Al-Hazmi Doubting FBI's Suspect List


The Saudi Gazette

September 23, 2001

MAKKAH/TUNIS--THE father of two young Saudi men suspected of involvement in the hijack of one of the aeroplanes that attacked World Trade Center in New York doubted his sons' involvement in the attack. He said the pictures of the two published by American zsecurity agencies were fake and do not even resemble his sons.


Muhammad Salim Al-Hazmi, father of the two suspects, Nawaf and Salim Muhammad Al-Hazmi, said that the published photos may be doctored or faked somehow. He said his two sons do not speak English and had never traveled to the US before. He insisted that the accusations levelled against his sons and other Saudi youths have no basis in reality. "Nawaf and Salim, as I know them, would not dare to commit such an abominable, inhuman and anti-religious act. They are well-behaved, nice young men who have been brought up in a family atmosphere free from any social or psychological problems, " he said.


Al-Hazmi continued, "As a father, I have a feeling that the two of them are still alive and unhurt, and will come back home in the near future when the truth is uncovered and the real culprits are found."


http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/2001/saudigazette092301.html


Even though photo's were released by the FBI on Sept. 27th. So by the 23rd what other pictures could the father be referring to?

This is an older photo of the alleged "Salem al-Hazmi, " released by the FBI.-wikipedia


But wait a minute...this is where it gets interesting...


February 2001: Two Hijackers Seen Living in San Antonio with Swapped Identities Complete 911 Timeline

At least six people with no connections to one another later claim they recognize hijackers Satam Al Suqami and Salem Alhazmi living in San Antonio, Texas, until this month. The management of an apartment building says the two men abandoned their leases at about this time, and some apartment residents recognize them.
However, all the witnesses say that Suqami was going by Alhazmi's name, and vice versa! [KENS 5 Eyewitness News, 10/1/01] One pilot shop employee recognizes Alhazmi as a frequent visitor to the store and interested in a 757 or 767 handbook, though he also says Alhazmi used Suqami's name. [KENS 5 Eyewitness News, 10/3/01] The apartment-leasing agent also recalls a Ziad Jarrah who once lived there in June 2001 and looked the same as the hijacker. [Associated Press, 9/22/01 (B); San Antonio Express-News, 9/22/01] Local FBI confirm that a Salem Alhazmi attended the nearby Alpha Tango Flight School and lived in that apartment building, but they say he is a different Salem Alhazmi who is still alive and living in Saudi Arabia. [KENS 5 Eyewitness News, 10/4/01] However, that "Salem Alhazmi" says he has never been to the US and has proven to the authorities that he did not leave Saudi Arabia in the two years prior to 9/11. [Washington Post, 9/20/01] The FBI does not explain Satam Al Suqami's presence. Neither hijacker is supposed to have arrived in the US before April 2001.
This is good because this is AFTER the Sept 27 FBI photos came out. Notice how people are "recognizing" their faces. So why would FBI say people are mistaken? Here we have a clear case of something very fishy going on officially.They recoginize him, yet he say he was using another hijackers name and the other was using his. Then the FBI say nope, not him that was "a Salem Alhazmi attended the nearby Alpha Tango Flight School and lived in that apartment building" but then say "he is a different Salem Alhazmi who is still alive and living in Saudi Arabia". HOW IS THIS ACTUALLY POSSIBLE? So people see two hijackers, names are swapped, except one they are mistaken on, he is actually innocent and alive. Except why would the alive one be USING THE NAME Satam Al Suqami?????


Khalidal Mihdhar:



ALIVE?

May be an assumed name; there are reports he is still alive [
CNN]

Officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said they were exploring several possibilities. One was that al-Midhar never entered the country and his name was simply used as an alias by one of the hijackers who died. Another possibility was that he allowed his name to be used on the flight by another hijacker, so that U.S. officials might assume he died, giving him time to escape the country. A third was that he did in fact die in the crash as a hijacker. [Guardian]

Badr Mohammed H. Hazmi, a San Antonio radiologist under arrest as a material witness, has used the alias of Khalid Al-Midhar, who is listed by the FBI as a hijacker on the flight that struck the Pentagon, according to documents distributed to law enforcement agencies. [Washington Post]

Three pictures of Almihdhar shown by the media

Eight days after the planes went down, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. distributed a "special alert" to its member banks asking for information about 21 "alleged suspects" in the attacks. The list said "Al-Midhar, Khalid Alive, " raising the possibility that the real Almihdhar never died on the plane. But one Justice Department official called the listing a "typo." [Cox News Service]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

While the FBI's confusion over Arabic names and identities was largely ignored in the American press, each blunder has made huge news in Saudi Arabia, casting doubt on U.S. intentions and convincing many Saudis that their country has been slandered.

"I want to think all this is a mistake, " said a bewildered Khalid al-Mihammadi, 24, a computer programmer from Mecca who was named wrongfully in an early list of hijackers released by the U.S. Justice Department. "We are America's friends, and they do this to us. It isn't fair."

Al-Mihammadi, who spent nine months studying English in the U.S., said he was watching television at home when shaken friends saw his photograph on the news and began to call to see if he was still alive. [Chicago Tribune]
Even Wikipedia acknowledges this:

After the attacks, reports began emerging saying that al-Mihdhar was still alive. On September 19, the FDIC distributed an official document clearly stating that al-Mihdhar is alive. The Justice Department says that this was a typo.[29][30] The BBC and The Guardian have since reported that there was evidence al-Mihdhar was still alive. This al-Midhar may have been a man with the same name.

Late in 2005, Army Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer and Congressman Curt Weldon alleged that the Defense Department data mining project Able Danger had kept al-Mihdhar, Mohamed Atta, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Marwan al-Shehhi all under surveillance as Al-Qaeda agents.

The three photographs of al-Mihdhar released by the FBI do not appear to be the same person.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalid_al-Mihdhar


Does this guy...

Look like this guy?

How about this guy?


An al-Qaida veteran


Khalid al-Mihdhar has been called an "al-Qaida veteran" by the CIA, and has fought in several major conflicts throughout his life. He was born in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, and in 1995 he went with Nawaf al-Hazmi (another alleged 9/11 hijacker) to Bosnia to join the fight between Muslims and Serbs.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalid_al-Mihdhar


Did Bush really see the plane crash on TV like he said that he did?

"Well, Jordan, you're not going to believe where, what state I was in when I heard about the terrorist attack. I was in Florida. And uh, my Chief of Staff, Andy Card...well actually, I was in a classroom...talking about a reading program—THAT WORKS! And uh, it uh, I had, I was sitting outside uh, the, the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower of an, of a T..., you know the TV was obviously on. And I, I used to fly myself and I said, well, there's one terrible pilot. And uh, I said it must have been a horrible accident.
But I was whisked off there, I didn't have much time to think about it. And I was sitting in the classroom and Andy Card, my Chief of Staff, who is sitting over here, walked in and said, 'A second plane has hit the tower, America is under attack'."
-Orange County Convention Center, Orlando, Florida (12/04/01)

President George W. Bush has claimed in two speeches that he saw one of the hijacked planes crash into the WTC live on TV when he was in a holding room at Booker Elementary School before his scheduled reading event with 2nd graders in Sarasota, Florida on September 11th, 2001.

It's assumed that he was referring to the first WTC plane crash as he specifically mentions this in one of his speeches, but could this have been possible? Was the first WTC plane crash shown anywhere live on TV? Had he even arrived at the school yet? Was he just mistaking about seeing the plane crash live on TV, or did Bush accidentally let it slip out that he witnessed the second plane crashing into the WTC before he went into his classroom reading event?

This oddity has even caught the attention of the mainstream media...

 

He couldn't have seen the first plane hit before he found out about the second plane. The video wasn't on TV until the next day. Bush doesn't have his story straight.

An interesting thing happened shortly thereafter. Condoleezza Rice -- who was not with me but was with the Vice President because they were in the White House compound -- called me on Air Force One after that, and said that she had gotten a call from Russia, from Vladimir Putin, who understood why we were putting our troops on alert, and, therefore, wasn't going to respond. That was an important phone call. Because when I was coming up, and a lot of other older-looking people here who were coming up with me -- (laughter) -- that would never have happened in the past. An alert by the United States would have caused Russia to go on alert, which would have created a complicated situation. But that wasn't the case.

By the way, we're heading into a new era. One of the positive things that comes out of the evil was, we're reassessing relationships in order to make the world more peaceful. I believe it's important for us to have positive relations with our former enemy and to rethink the defenses of the United States of America. (Applause.).....

.......gotta love this. Okay he is saying that normally russia would have been on alert when we were but this time they weren't so that right there tells us that something was going on or else they would have been on alert. They must have known that it wasn't serious. I mean they must have known that it was our own people blowing up the WTC's to start war on iraq. Now he mentions heading a new era, could he be talking about a new world order? He says positive things that comes out of the evil was reassessing relationships in order to make the world more peaceful, as in trying to make peace with everything and come together. Make positive relations with our former enemy. It sounds alot like he was trying to set us up for coming together of a new world order. If you think about it. The attack on the WTC did bring people together. There were songs about the US and about being American. We were all holding hands and shit like that but if we look back on it it's easy to see how that could have been a blinding piece in this puzzle. Let us see how beautiful it can be so that we don't see how ugly it really is.

Bush says he saw a plane crash into the WTC

@ 8:52am ET, ABCNEWS' Good Morning America broke in with a special report showing flames coming out of the World Trade Center. At the time, President Bush's motorcade was arriving at the Emma Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Fla., for a planned event..." -ABC (9/14/01)

"@ 8:46 a.m. Mr. Bush and his aides, including Mr. Card, arrived nine minutes later [ 8:55 a.m.] at the elementary school... "We're on time," the president remembered. "I like to stay on time; I like to be crisp." -Washington Times (10/07/02)

Sometime shortly after 9am - Bush enters Sandra Kay Daniel's 2nd grade class...

@ just after 9:00am Bush entered Daniels' second-grade classroom. She began a lesson as the Secret Service agents lying in the trusses above her room listened along with the president and the children." -Sarasota Herald-Tribune (9/10/02)

9:03 am - The second plane crashes into the South WTC.

It is reported that Bush had already entered the classroom before the second plane crash.

But is it true that Bush entered the classroom before the second WTC plane crash, or could the media reports be wrong?

Since we don't know exactly what time Bush entered the classroom, we have to figure out the next best thing, the time Andrew Card enters the classroom and whispers in Bush's ear about the second plane crash.

(9:05 - 9:07 am) Card whispers into Bush's ear about the second plane crash...

"@ 9:05am While preparing for a photo op with a second grade class, chief of staff Andy Card entered and gave him news of the second crash." -Patriot Resource

"@ 9:05am Bush is visiting a second-grade class when Card whispers to him that a second plane has struck the towers." -September 11 News .com

"'A second plane hit the second tower. America is under attack.'
White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card leaned over and whispered these words into President Bush's right ear at
9:07 a.m. September 11." -Washington Times (10/08/02)

"Bush had received the first news of the attack at 9:07 a.m., three minutes after he had stepped into a classroom to hear 18 second-graders show off their reading skills when his chief of staff, Andrew H. Card Jr., leaned over and whispered to him. Bush, whose eyes had been sparkling, looked suddenly grim. That was when officials still thought the crash at the World Trade Center was an accident, and he went ahead with the photo opportunity." -Washington Post (9/11/01)

Andrew Card informs Bush of the second WTC plane crash between 9:05 and 9:07 a.m. as reported by the media.

Now the video of Bush at Booker shows Bush entering the classroom to when Andrew Card whispers in Bush's right ear. Now in order to find the exact time Bush enters the classroom, we have to find out how long it took from when Bush enters the classroom to when Card whispers in Bush's ear on the video.

(You can watch the entire Bush at Booker video here. The whole video is approximately 10 minutes long.)

After watching the video, this site has calculated the time from when Bush enters the room up to the time Andrew Card whispers in his ear to be about 2 minutes and 50 seconds. We will just round it up to an even 3 minutes to make it easier.

Next we have to determine how long it would take for Bush to walk from his holding room to the 2nd grade classroom. Now of course this is impossible to know, because we don't know the distance of the holding room Bush was in to the classroom. Logic though would have that Bush's holding room would be close to the classroom (within one or two classrooms away) for security reasons.

Now, sit in a chair and time yourself how long it takes for you to get up and casually walk the distance of one or two large rooms. You should probably be able to do this within 60 seconds.

Now remember, in Bush's first speech, he said that after he saw the plane crash into the WTC, he didn't have time to think about it because he was "whisked off there", presumably to the classroom reading event

Now by this account, Bush makes it sound like he was sitting in his holding room, he saw the plane crash live on TV, and he was then quickly taken away by his staff to go into the classroom for his reading event. This would be consistent if he saw the second WTC plane crash.

Remember it was just under 9:03 am when the second plane crashed into the WTC and it was reported between 9:05 - 9:07 am when Andrew Card whispered in Bush's ear about the second crash. That is 2 to 4 minutes between the time the second plane crashes and when Card whispers in Bush's ear.

So by it taking 3 minutes for when Bush enters the classroom to when Card whispers in his ear, Bush would have had to enter the classroom anywhere between 9:02 - 9:04 am. If Card whispered to Bush at around 9:07am, it is technically possible that Bush could have seen the second plane crash at 9:03 am, took 60 seconds to be whisked out of the holding room and walk the distance of a classroom or two and enter the classroom reading event where 3 minutes later Andrew Card tells Bush of the second crash.

 

9:03 am - Second plane crashes into the WTC.

+

60 seconds for Bush to be "whisked off" out of his holding room and into the classroom.

=

9:04 am

+

3 minutes from when Bush enters the classroom until Cards whispers in his ear.

=

9:07 am - The time some media reports have Card whispering in Bush's ear...

"'A second plane hit the second tower. America is under attack.'
White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card leaned over and whispered these words into President Bush's right ear at
9:07 a.m. September 11." -Washington Times (10/08/02)

"I said, 'A second plane hit the second tower. America is under attack.'
'The president's eyes got wide … and the face told it all,' Compton said, noting that 'something terribly grave. … Something beyond imagining' happened around
9:07 a.m. ET, according to her notes." -ABC (9/14/01)

So by this account, it is possible for Bush to have witnessed the second WTC plane crash live on TV at the school and it would be consistent with the claim in his first speech about seeing a plane crash into the WTC live on TV and not having too much time to think about it because he was whisked off to his reading event

So, if Bush did see the second WTC plane crash after he was informed about the first plane crash outside the school and then was quickly whisked off to his scheduled reading by his staff, what does that say about the actions of the President of the United States and his staff on 9/11?

This site can only think of one logical answer to that. Bush and his staff were totally complicity with the 9/11 attacks.

Things you should keep in mind:

 

January 26, 1998 - The Project for the New American Century sent President Clinton a letter recommending U.S. military action to get Saddam Hussein out of power saying among other things that he's a threat to a "significant portion of the world’s supply of oil". Of the 18 PNAC members who signed the letter, 10 are now in the Bush administration.

September 2000 - One year before the attacks, the conservative advocacy group Project for the New American Century (PNAC) advocates the build up of the U.S. military, but won't think it will happen unless the U.S. experiences a major catastrophic event such as a "new Pearl Harbor".

1945 Plane Crash Rocked NYC

Empire State Building Hit
by Military Plane, 14 Killed

The last time a plane crashed into a New York City skyscraper was July 28, 1945. A U.S. bomber flying through thick fog at about 200 mph crashed into the Empire State Building, one of the most recognized structures in the world.

Fourteen people were killed, and dozens injured.

Eyewitnesses, aware the United States was in the midst of World War II, feared the worst.

"Thought we'd been bombed," Doris Pope, Boynton Beach, Fla. told the The Palm Beach Post in 1999. "I worked for the Office of Office of Price Administration in the Empire State Building. That day, as we were getting ready to take our coffee break, we heard this terrible noise, and the building started to shake. … As we looked out our third-floor window, we saw debris fall on to the street. We immediately thought New York was being bombed.

"We were then told that an airplane hit the building," she continued.

Plane Cleared to Land in Newark

On that day in 1945, an Army Air Corps B-25 bomber headed from Bedford, Mass., to Newark, N.J., was lumbering low over Manhattan in extremely thick fog, according to reports.

Lt. Col. William F. Smith Jr., the pilot of the B-25, was told to land at Municipal Airport in Queens (now known as LaGuardia). But he insisted for clearance at Newark, according to a New York Times report.

Reports say that just as Smith was cleared to land, he was already headed toward disaster. Government regulations said that aircraft should fly at least 2,000 feet over Manhattan. The plane struck the building 913 feet above the ground, at 34th Street in midtown. The plane's nose had crashed into the building's north side.

"It was rainy, overcast," Louis Triandafilou, an Army Air Forces photographic lab chief stationed at Newark Airport who took aerial photographs of weather conditions told the Clearwater Times in 1991. "You couldn't see the peak of the Empire State Building, and part of the Statue of Liberty's torch was obscured by fog."

When the plane crashed, one of its engines whizzed from the north wall, and through the south wall, ultimately landing on the roof of a nearby building. Debris from the building and plane also severed through elevator cables, and sent two cars and passengers into freefall.

Smith was killed, along with the other two crewmembers, in addition to another 11 people working at their desks, and over two dozen more were injured. The workers were on the staff of the National Catholic Welfare Service, now known as Catholic Relief Services, who still keep their offices on the 79th floor.

About $1 million in damage was reportedly done to the building. Because it was Saturday, the offices were not fully staffed, perhaps preventing more damage and injuries, reports say.

Eyewitnesses Remember Panic

Eyewitnesses who are still alive and were there for the incident remember midtown Manhattan being in a state of panic.

"I heard a horrendous noise," eyewitness Helen J. Hurwitt, from Greenacres, Fla., told the Post. "My husband and I were in a building directly opposite the Empire State Building. … Large plate-glass windows looked out onto 34th Street. The floor we were on was pretty high. At some point, we heard a horrendous noise and rushed to the windows. … We were horrified to see a B-25 half in and half out of the Empire State Building."

Reports say that it took three months to repair the 78th and 79th floors, both of which were damaged. Crews had to repair bent girders, seal the walls, and restore the two floors of offices.

Today, the building remains structurally sound, say reports.

"Since 1994, our government had received information that international terrorists "had seriously considered the use of airplanes as a means of carrying out terrorist attacks." -CNN (9/12/02)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. "Q Had there been any warnings that the President knew of?
MR. FLEISCHER:
No warnings." -White House

1. "President Bush and his top advisers were informed by the CIA early last August that terrorists associated with Osama bin Laden had discussed the possibility of hijacking airplanes, according to reliable sources.
White House spokesman
Ari Fleischer confirmed that Bush had been told about the possibility of hijackings but he declined to say what had been revealed during his intelligence briefings." -Washington Post (5/16/02)

3. U.S. intelligence agencies hadHYPERLINK "http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2001/09/11/attack-intelligence.htm" no warning
"For all its technological prowess and military might, the United States didn't see this coming. None of the vaunted intelligence tools at the nation's disposal gave any warning of the coming nightmare — a massively coordinated effort to hijack and crash at least four airliners at the same time. U.S. officials confirmed they had no reports that such attacks were imminent. Not from the CIA's networks of spies and informants. Not from the FBI's many counterintelligence agents. Not from the National Security Agency's telephone and computer taps. Not from the military's satellites or spy planes." -USATODAY / AP (9/11/01)

3. "White House officials acknowledged that U.S. intelligence officials informed President Bush weeks before the Sept. 11 attacks that bin Laden's terrorist network might try to hijack American planes, and that information prompted administration officials to issue a private warning to transportation officials and national security agencies." -ABC (5/16/02)

Why was the White House staff given the powerful anthrax antibiotic Cipro on 9/11, a full month before the first cases of anthrax were reported?

"Evidence obtained through Judicial Watch and confirmed by multiple press reports suggest that White House staff had been given doses of the powerful antibiotic Cipro at the time of the September 11 terrorist attacks, one month before anthrax was detected on Capitol Hill." - Judicial Watch

Is it just a coincidence that the first anthrax victim was a photo editor at American Media, Inc., who owns the National Enquire, and published a photo of Bush's daughter Jenna shown drunk with a cigarette in her hand falling on top of another girl

8:40am FAA notifies NORAD that flight 11 has been hijacked

8:43am FAA notifies NORAD that flight 175 has been hijacked

Why hasn't Bush been informed yet by the FAA or NORAD about two planes being hijacked?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Flight 175: Marwan Al-Shehhi, Fayez Ahmed, Mohald Alshehri, Hamza Alghamdi and Ahmed Alghamdi

Flight 11: Waleed M Alshehri, Wail Alshehri, Mohamed Atta, Abdulaziz Alomari and Satam Al Suqami

Flight 77: Khalid Al-Midhar, Majed Moqed, Nawaq Alhamzi, Salem Alhamzi and Hani Hanjour

Flight 93: Ahmed Alhaznawi, Ahmed Alnami, Ziad Jarrahi and Saeed Alghamdi

fastgreenatm.jpg

walmart.jpg

story.jpg

portl16.jpg

portl14.jpg

hanjour_moqued_atm.jpg

hanjour1.jpg

dulles_hanihanjour_cu.jpg

alomari.gif

121_salem_alhazmi_id_card.jpg

dulles_hanihanjour.jpg

attaol6.jpg

abdulaziz_al-omari_alive.jpg

253_dulles_hijackers2.jpg

aa_flight_11_manifest.gif